Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Messrs. Fauver & Fauver and Mr. Scribner L. Fauver, for appellant.
Messrs. Severs & Glavas and Mr. G. L. Severs, for appellees.
Supreme Court of Ohio.
TAFT, C. J.
Because of the concurring opinion by Judge Schneider, we will first consider whether plaintiff has a right to maintain this action.
It is alleged in the petition that plaintiff is a taxpayer of the city of Oberlin and brings this action on behalf of the city, that as such taxpayer plaintiff duly requested in writing the city solicitor to bring this action, and that said solicitor declined in writing to bring the action. Defendant's answer admits...
NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.
As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.