Per Curiam.
Defendant contends that he was denied his constitutional rights in that he was not represented by counsel and did not have his right to counsel explained to him.
It appearing that defendant did not have counsel, that his right to counsel was not explained to him, and that he did not waive his right to counsel, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed on authority of Johnson v. Maxwell, Warden,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.