BOROUGH EXP. v. SCHOENBAUM & HERMELIN


46 Misc.2d 959 (1965)

Borough Express, Inc., Respondent, v. Schoenbaum & Hermelin Express, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

April 8, 1965


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Greenspan for appellant. Arnold P. Azarow for respondent.

Concur — HECHT, J. P., TILZER and HOFSTADTER, JJ.


Per Curiam.

Although the shipments here involved were eventually destined for consignees outside the State, they were turned over to the defendant in New York City for delivery to consolidators or designated agents in New York City only. Therefore, defendant was engaged as a carrier in the transportation of property "wholly within" the City of New York. Since it is not alleged that the merchandise moved "under a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases