1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 236 Md.
  5. 236 Md. 589 (1964)
 

SISK v. STATE

[No. 55, September Term, 1964.]

236 Md. 589 (1964)

204 A.2d 684

SISK v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 20, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Paul Rogers for appellant.

Stuart H. Rome, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, William J. O'Donnell and Alfred J. O'Ferrall, III, State's Attorney and Assistant State's Attorney, respectively, for Baltimore City, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and SYBERT, JJ.

PRESCOTT, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is appellant's second attempt to offset his conviction of obtaining money by false pretenses under Code (1957), Article 27, Section 140. In his first appeal, Sisk v. State, 232 Md. 155, we held that the Regiscope photograph, which convicted him, had not been properly authenticated, and remanded for a new trial.

Although State's Exhibit No. 1, a check,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases