20 A.D.2d 720 (1964)

Miriam Miller et al., Respondents, v. City of New York et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 17, 1964

Order modified by striking therefrom the third decretal paragraph. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the Special Term (see 39 Misc.2d 424) that the agreement of October 18, 1962, entered into between the Commissioner of Parks and a named corporation, pursuant to which the corporation was to construct, and to operate for a period of 20 years, a golf driving range, parking lot and accessory buildings in Kissena Park, constituted a lease and not a license and that, therefore, such agreement was invalid under section 384 of the New York City Charter (cf. Williams v. Hylan, 223 App. Div. 48, affd. sub nom. Williams v. City of N. Y., 248 N.Y. 616; Matter of Terrell v. Moses, 4 A.D.2d 171). However, the third decretal paragraph of the order appealed from should be deleted. It may be construed as an adjudication that a golf driving range may not be constructed and operated in the park under any circumstances. That question was not passed upon in the court below, and we express no opinion with respect to it on this appeal. Lordi v. County of Nassau (20 A.D.2d 658), holding that an agreement for the operation of a store for the sale of golf equipment, etc., in a county park, was a license and not a lease, is factually distinguishable.


1000 Characters Remaining reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases