BRADSHAW v. FRANK M. MURPHY & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No. 33145.

162 So.2d 519 (1964)

Herman M. BRADSHAW, Petitioner, v. FRANK M. MURPHY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Shelby Mutual Insurance Company and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 3, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harlan Tuck, of Bassett & Tuck, Maitland, for petitioner.

John McQuigg, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, for Frank M. Murphy & Associates, Inc., and Shelby Mutual Ins. Co.

Paul E. Speh and Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, for Florida Industrial Commission.


PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 26, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases