1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 1 Ohio
  5. 1 Ohio St. 2d 66 (1964)
 

IN RE ESTATE OF PAICH

Nos. 38168 and 38169.

1 Ohio St. 2d 66 (1964)

IN RE ESTATE OF PAICH: HIRSCHENBERGER, APPELLEE, v. COOKSTON, ADMR., APPELLANT. IN RE ESTATE OF PAICH: NAGY, APPELLEE, v. COOKSTON, ADMR., APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 29, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Snyder, Neff & Chamberlain, Mr. Raymond E. Cookston and Mr. Owen C. Neff, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

The domicile of decedent is a question of fact. The records contain sufficient evidence to support the judgment of the Probate Court. The Court of Appeals was in error in substituting its judgment for that of the Probate Court on a question of fact and entering final judgments. In re Estate of Tyler, 159 Ohio St. 492. However, its judgment doing so may be treated as a reversal on the weight of the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases