WOODHULL v. MANAHAN


43 N.J. 445 (1964)

205 A.2d 441

VICTOR L. WOODHULL, WILLIAM E. WIDERKEHR, RICHARD L. STARK, ARTHUR G. TOOMER, JR., RICHARD J. LYONS AND HAROLD W. WATSON, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. J. RAYMOND MANAHAN AND E. MARCO STIRONE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND DAVID E. NOONAN, RUSSELL J. NONCARROW AND ANTHONY J. CATTANO, DEFENDANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 14, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Henry M. Hoyt argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Corbin, Hoyt & Watson, attorneys).

Mr. Myron J. Bromberg argued the cause for defendant-respondent Manahan (Messrs. Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, attorneys).

Mr. Alvin Weiss argued the cause for defendant-respondent Stirone (Messrs. Riker, Danzig, Scherer & Brown, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

The Appellate Division held the mayor of the Town of Morristown has the power to veto appointments by the Common Council of the town attorney and committees of the Council. Woodhull v. Manahan, 85 N.J.Super. 157 (1964). A petition for certification was filed and because of time limitations, we directed argument on the merits prior to action upon the petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases