FORD v. ACME ROOF DECKS, INC.

No. 33530.

168 So.2d 316 (1964)

Leila FORD, Petitioner, v. ACME ROOF DECKS, INC., Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 28, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Sicking and Kaplan, Ser, Abrams & O'Malley, Miami, for petitioner.

Lally, Miller & Hodges, Miami, for respondent Acme Roof Decks, Inc., and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondent Florida Industrial Commission.


PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 24, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases