1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 43 N.J.
  5. 43 N.J. 430 (1964)
 

VESPE v. DiMARCO

43 N.J. 430 (1964)

204 A.2d 874

JOSEPH VESPE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES B. DiMARCO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 1, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sidney M. Schreiber argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Gerald W. Conway, on the brief; Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos, attorneys).

Mr. Michael Patrick King argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Mr. Arthur Montano, of counsel; Messrs. Kisselman, Devine, Deighan & Montano, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.

In this case plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injuries and monetary losses which he claimed were caused by defendant's negligence in the operation of his automobile. After trial the jury, by a vote of ten to two, returned a verdict for the defendant. The Appellate Division affirmed in an unreported opinion and we granted plaintiff's petition for certification. 42 N.J. 141

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases