1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 169 So.2d
  5. 169 So.2d 282 (1964)
 

ROGERS v. CITY OF MOBILE

1 Div. 95, 95-A to 95-C.

169 So.2d 282 (1964)

George T. ROGERS et al. v. CITY OF MOBILE et al.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Rehearings Denied December 10, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lyons, Pipes & Cook, Mobile, for appellant Rogers.

Sam M. Johnston, Bert S. Nettles and Johnston, Johnston & Courtney, Mobile, for appellant Boyes.

Wm. R. Lauten, Pillans, Reams, Tappan, Wood & Roberts, Wilkins, Stephenson & Byrd and Vickers, Riis, Murray & Curran, Mobile, and Wm. Alfred Rose, Ellene Winn, Harry R. Teel and White, Bradley, Arant, All & Rose, Birmingham, for appellees.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Robt. P. Bradley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

GOODWYN, Justice.

These six related appeals from two decrees of the circuit court of Mobile County, in equity, (herein referred to as the August 13th and August 31st decrees), rendered in the same case, were submitted here on one record by agreement of the parties. Also before us are petitions for certiorari under Supreme Court Rule 18, filed by intervenor-appellant Earl T. Boyes in connection with his appeals.

We have concluded that the decrees should be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases