1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 163 So.2d
  5. 163 So.2d 264 (1964)
 

NASTER v. NASTER

No. 32666.

163 So.2d 264 (1964)

Bert NASTER, Petitioner, v. Lee NASTER, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Rehearing Denied May 13, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Pardo, Miami, for petitioner.

Ralph R. Quillian, Hollywood, for respondent.

THORNAL, Justice.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, allegedly in conflict with prior decisions of this Court.

The alleged point of cleavage involves a consideration of the extent of a husband's burden when defending against an alimony contempt citation on the ground of financial inability to pay.

The decision submitted for review is Naster v. Naster, Fla.App.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases