LAABS v. BOLGER


25 Wis.2d 17 (1964)

LAABS and wife, Appellants, v. BOLGER and wife, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

September 29, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by M. Wesley Kuswa, attorney, and Clarence P. Nett of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Kuswa.

For the respondents there was a brief by O'Melia & Kaye of Rhinelander, and oral argument by Walter F. Kaye.


CURRIE, C. J.

While other issues are raised by the parties, we deem it sufficient for the purpose of this appeal to confine this opinion to two issues:

(1) Are the findings of fact of the trial court with respect to defendants' acts of adverse possession against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence?

(2) If such findings are not against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence, are such findings sufficient to support...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases