1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 43 N.J.
  5. 43 N.J. 368 (1964)
 

IN RE APPLICATION OF FISHER

43 N.J. 368 (1964)

204 A.2d 841

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF EDWIN FISHER AND HARRY SZKOLAR, APPLICANTS, FOR AN ORDER ADJUDICATING CHAPTER 152 OF THE LAWS OF 1962 TO BE NULL AND VOID IN ACCORDANCE WITH REVISED STATUTES OF NEW JERSEY 1:7-4 AS AMENDED. EDWIN FISHER AND HARRY SZKOLAR, APPLICANTS-APPELLANTS, v. ARTHUR J. SILLS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND HERMAN ADES AND ABE STERN, ETC., ET ALS., INTERVENERS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 16, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Stephen B. Wiley argued the cause for applicants-appellants (Messrs. Meyner & Wiley, attorneys).

Mr. David J. Goldberg, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Mr. Harold H. Fisher argued the cause for interveners-defendants-respondents (Messrs. Shanley & Fisher, attorneys; Mr. John Kandravy, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion by Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division. 80 N.J.Super. 523 (1963).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases