1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 43 N.J.
  5. 43 N.J. 359 (1964)
 

HODES v. OAK FLOORING CO.

43 N.J. 359 (1964)

204 A.2d 705

ALBERT HODES, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, MARIAN KALB, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. OAK FLOORING CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 16, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Adrian M. Foley, Jr. argued the cause for respondent-appellant (Messrs. Pindar, McElroy, Connell & Foley, attorneys).

Mr. Herman M. Wilson argued the cause for petitioner-respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.

Petitioner (hereinafter plaintiff) obtained a judgment against Oak Flooring Co. (hereinafter defendant) in the Workmen's Compensation Division. Defendant filed a notice of appeal to the Union County Court with the Workmen's Compensation Division at Trenton on the 45th day after the compensation judgment was filed in the Division, but did not file its notice of appeal with the Clerk of Union County until the 46th...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases