1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 328 F.2d
  5. 328 F.2d 73 (1964)
 

MILLER AND COMPANY OF BIRMINGHAM v. LOUISVILLE & N. R. CO.

No. 20355.

328 F.2d 73 (1964)

MILLER AND COMPANY OF BIRMINGHAM, Inc., Appellant, v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

January 31, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Clark, Birmingham, Ala., London, Yancey, Clark & Allen, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for appellant.

Henry E. Simpson, Birmingham, Ala., Lange, Simpson, Robinson & Somerville, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for appellee.

Before RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

In a declaratory judgment action, the district court construed the indemnity provisions of a spur-track agreement between the railroad and the industry1 in favor of the railroad. The case was tried on stipulated facts. Paragraphs (12) and (14) of the contract between the railroad (first party) and the industry (second party) read as follows:

"(12) Second party agrees that it will not construct any overhead...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases