1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 25 Wis.2d
  5. 25 Wis.2d 364 (1964)
 

LE MENSE v. THIEL

25 Wis.2d 364 (1964)

LE MENSE, Special Administratrix, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THIEL, Defendant: EMPLOYERS MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 27, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Kaftan, Kaftan & Kaftan of Green Bay, and oral argument by Fred F. Kaftan.

For the respondent there was a brief by Clark, Rankin, Nash & Spindler of Manitowoc, and oral argument by John M. Spindler.

GORDON, J.

The issue in this case relates to the following words affecting coverage under an automobile insurance policy: "furnished for the regular use...." On a motion for summary judgment, the trial court dismissed the complaint against the insurer, having concluded that the automobile in question was in fact furnished for the regular use of the driver, Mr. Thiel.

There are three strings to the appellant's bow. She contends that the evidence demonstrates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases