1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 238 Or.
  5. 238 Or. 51 (1964)
 

SCHOOL DIST. 16-R v. McCORMMACH

238 Or. 51 (1964)

392 P.2d 1019

SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 16-R UMATILLA COUNTY v. McCORMMACH ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed June 17, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nels Peterson, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Currin & French, Pendleton.

Harold A. Fabre, Pendleton, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Fabre & Collins, Pendleton.

Before ROSSMAN, Presiding Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and GOODWIN, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal by defendants, William Orval McCormmach and Merle McCormmach, husband and wife, from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a directed verdict. The complaint alleged that during the school terms 1955-1956 to 1961-1962 defendants resided outside the plaintiff school district and that during these terms they sent their four children to schools within the plaintiff district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases