1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 236 Md.
  5. 236 Md. 51 (1964)
 

SMITH v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC

[No. 321, September Term, 1963.]

236 Md. 51 (1964)

202 A.2d 604

SMITH ET AL. v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided July 20, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Waldo Burnside for Alfred H. Smith, one of the appellants.

Alger Y. Barbee, with whom were Charles C. Futterer and Barbee & Starratt on the brief, for the Thos. Somerville Company, the other appellant.

Richard W. Emory, with whom were Jerrold V. Powers, Cornelius Means, Venable, Baetjer & Howard and Sasscer, Clagett & Powers on the brief, for the appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HAMMOND, HORNEY, MARBURY and SYBERT, JJ.

BRUNE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The property owner, Thos. Somerville Co. (Somerville), and Alfred H. Smith, who, for convenience, may be called Somerville's tenant or lessee, appeal separately (both appeals being combined in one record) from judgments entered upon the inquisition of a jury in a condemnation suit instituted by Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO). The taking by eminent domain is for purposes of a high tension electric line, and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases