The LUMMUS COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
LOCAL 80, UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF the PLUMBING AND PIPE FITTING INDUSTRY OF the UNITED STATES AND CANADA, AFL-CIO, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued December 13, 1963.
Decided June 11, 1964.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. John J. Donovan, with whom Miss Betty Jane Southard, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 17943. Mr. Roger H. Muzzall, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for petitioner in No. 17943.
Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Mr. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Mr. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Mr. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for respondent in No. 17943 and petitioner in No. 17981.
Mr. Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for respondent in No. 17981.
Mr. Quentin O. Young, Washington, D. C., filed a brief on behalf of National Constructors Association and The Painting and Decorating Contractors of America, Inc., as amici curiæ.
Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, PRETTYMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
PRETTYMAN, Senior Circuit Judge:
The Lummus Company petitions for court review of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board, which held the Company to have violated Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act.1 The Board in the same decision held respondent Local 80 to have violated Sections 8(b) (2) and 8(b) (1) (A).2 The Board has petitioned for enforcement of its order against...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
