1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 212 Cal.App.2d
  5. 212 Cal.App.2d 784 (1963)
 

RODDISCRAFT, INC. v. SKELTON LOGGING CO.

Docket No. 20270.

212 Cal.App.2d 784 (1963)

28 Cal. Rptr. 277

RODDISCRAFT, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. SKELTON LOGGING COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

February 8, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hill & Hill, Arthur W. Hill and Robert Dunaway for Defendant and Appellant.

Rader & Truitt and Richard E. Rader for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

MOLINARI, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order of the trial court granting plaintiffs' motion for a new trial, following a jury verdict for the defendant, on the ground that the court had erred in refusing plaintiffs' requested instructions on res ipsa loquitur. The requested instructions were substantially in the form of BAJI No. 206 (revised) and BAJI No. 206-A (revised).

QUESTION PRESENTED

The sole question presented on appeal is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases