ERNST v. ERNST


40 Misc.2d 934 (1963)

Rose Ernst, Plaintiff, v. Robert Ernst et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

November 4, 1963


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Onie & Fluke (Harry M. Onie of counsel), for plaintiff. Levy & Charwat (Mark S. Charwat of counsel), for defendants.


MURRAY T. FEIDEN, J.

This is a motion by the plaintiff for temporary alimony and counsel fees.

The complaint contains two causes of action. The first cause of action is for a declaratory judgment to annul an Arkansas divorce decree obtained by the defendant Robert Ernst on the basis of constructive notice, the wife not having appeared or been served personally, and to declare the nullity of the allegedly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases