The charge was a violation of section 7210 of the Education Law and, following a hearing, the board determined that the petitioner was guilty of fraud and deceit in accordance with paragraphs d and g of subdivision 1 which read: "d. Upon proof that the holder of such license is falsely impersonating a practitioner or former practitioner or is practicing under an assumed or fictitious name." "g. Upon proof that the holder of such license is guilty of fraud or deceit or of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.