LAX v. HERMAN


19 A.D.2d 881 (1963)

Bernard Lax, Appellant, v. George Herman et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of "Herman Diamond, Bassock, Arnold and Easton", Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 21, 1963


Order, entered on February 26, 1963, denying motion for summary judgment affirmed, with costs to abide the event.

The extent to which plaintiff participated in the firm affairs in the role of a partner before the letter of January 20, 1962 would have bearing on the meaning which all parties attached to the written expression in that letter "If * * * your partnership agreement with this firm has for any reason not been consummated". The usual meaning of those words...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases