1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 367 S.W.2d
  5. 367 S.W.2d 415 (1963)
 

MACKAY v. CASH

No. 16164.

367 S.W.2d 415 (1963)

William P. MACKAY et al., Appellants, v. James R. CASH, Appellee.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

Rehearing Denied May 17, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold C. Abramson and Palmer & Palmer, Dallas, for appellants.

Marcus & Lewis, Strasburger, Price, Kelton, Miller & Martin, and Royal H. Brin, Jr., Dallas, for appellee.

DIXON, Chief Justice.

This suit involves the interpretation of a written instrument which is the basis of a suit for damages for breach of a contract.

The trial court, holding the contract to be ambiguous, allowed extrinsic evidence to be received to explain the meaning of the document. Appropriate issues were submitted to a jury. The answers of the jury were favorable to appellee Cash. Based on the jury verdict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases