MATTER OF D'ESPOSITO v. GABEL


40 Misc.2d 721 (1963)

In the Matter of Louis D'Esposito et al., Petitioners, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

October 4, 1963


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Farlekas for petitioners. Beatrice Shainswit and Florence R. Zimmerman for Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, respondent. Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel, for Department of Buildings of City of New York, respondent.


CHARLES A. LORETO, J.

Petitioner seeks an order restraining the City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator from reducing rents in his apartment building and for a further order directing a reinspection of the premises. Respondents cross-move to dismiss the petition on the grounds that no final determination has been made as required by section 7801 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules.

At the outset it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases