Section 2905.40, Revised Code, purporting to impose an absolute criminal liability upon one who operates or permits another to operate on his premises a picture machine exhibiting proscribed pictures without reference to guilty knowledge (scienter) or guilty purpose (mens rea) on the part of the accused is unconstitutional. City of Cincinnati v. Marshall,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
STATE v. GRIFFITH
No. 37805.
174 Ohio St. 553 (1963)
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. GRIFFITH, APPELLANT.
Supreme Court of Ohio.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 29, 1963.
Decided May 29, 1963.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.