Per Curiam.
Petitioner's primary contention in this action is that his incarceration was void because it was based on illegally obtained evidence and thus was contrary to the principles enunciated in Mapp v. Ohio,
According to petitioner, on March 17, 1960, he was sitting in his car which was properly parked in the city of Cincinnati when two police officers accosted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
