IN RE HYNDA


40 N.J. 586 (1963)

194 A.2d 235

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL J. HYNDA, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW OF NEW JERSEY.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 7, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frederick C. Vonhof argued the cause for the Essex County Ethics Committee.

Mr. Frederick B. Lacey argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Shanley & Fisher, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

When this matter was originally here, respondent sought to present mitigating facts to us which had not been offered before the Ethics Committee. We indicated that proper procedure calls for such evidence to be presented to the Committee as part of the proceedings before it and remanded the matter to give respondent that opportunity. At the same time we directed his suspension from the practice of law until...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases