Claimant had judgment in a third-party action in the Supreme Court for $1,533.50 entered in 1956, and thereafter applied to the Workmen's Compensation Board to reopen his claim to provide for deficiency compensation.
The carrier argued in opposition to this application that the judgment was in actuality the result of a compromise of claimant's third-party action, and since it was without the carrier's written consent within subdivision...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
