ROUMEL v. FUDE

No. 36596.

62 Wn.2d 397 (1963)

383 P.2d 283

BILL D. ROUMEL et al., Appellants, v. DONALD FUDE et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

June 20, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davies, Pearson, Anderson & Pearson, for appellants.

Edwin R. Johnson, for respondents.


HILL, J.

The defendants say this is a "following car" case; the plaintiffs say that it is a "changing lanes and cutting in" case and that they became a "following car" solely because the defendant-driver changed lanes and cut in front of them so sharply that they had no opportunity to stop before colliding with defendants' car. The jury found against plaintiffs on their complaint and against the defendants on their cross complaint; in short, for the defendants without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases