MTR. OF DIMOWITZ v. TEACHERS' RETIRE. BD.


18 A.D.2d 395 (1963)

In the Matter of Ernest M. Dimowitz et al., Appellants, et al., Petitioners, v. Teachers' Retirement Board of the City of New York et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 30, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin M. Zelman of counsel (Zelman & Zelman, attorneys), for appellants.

Isidore Heyman of counsel (Seymour B. Quel and Joseph M. Callahan, Jr., with him on the brief; Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel, attorney), for respondents.

BOTEIN, P. J., BREITEL, RABIN, EAGER and STEUER, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

Appellants are presently employed by the Board of Education of the City of New York and are contributors under the retirement system administered by the Teachers' Retirement Board of the City of New York (hereinafter referred to as the Board), one of the two respondents herein. In computing the length of service of a contributor for retirement purposes the Board is required to give him credit for all "city-service", which is defined as "any service...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases