DE SOMBRE v. BICKEL


18 Wis.2d 390 (1963)

DE SOMBRE, Respondent, v. BICKEL, Appellant. [Case No. 68.] BICKEL, Appellant, v. EDGAR STUBENRAUCH & ASSOCIATES, INC., Respondent. [Case No. 69.]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 8, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Holden & Peckham of Sheboygan, and oral argument by Verlin H. Peckham.

For the respondent Earl F. De Sombre there was a brief by Clemens, Miller, Hayes & Werner of Sheboygan, and oral argument by John M. Hayes.

For the respondent Edgar Stubenrauch & Associates, Inc., there was a brief by Humke, Poole & Axel of Sheboygan, and oral argument by John M. Poole.


HALLOWS, J.

Appellant complains of the following defects and faulty workmanship: Failure to provide slip-expansion joints on the fascia; the using of one-inch-square tubing instead of wrought-iron three-quarter-inch bars on the metal railing of the roof; failure to paint the underside of all tin and galvanized-metal work; failure to provide a gravity-type screened vent above the roof; failure to design the roof to provide sufficient ventilation to prevent condensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases