MONSANTO CHEMICAL COMPANY, Libelant-Appellee,
v.
NO. 3 BULL TOWING COMPANY, THE BULL DURHAM, and BARGE NBC 965, Respondents-Appellants.
MONSANTO CHEMICAL COMPANY, Libelant-Cross-Appellant,
v.
NO. 3 BULL TOWING COMPANY, The Bull Durham, and Barge NBC 965, Respondents-Cross-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 18, 1963.
December 18, 1963.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Charles Kohlmeyer, Jr., New Orleans, La., and John B. Mack, Memphis, Tenn., Clarence Clifton, Memphis, Tenn., on the brief; Clifton, Mack & Kirkpatrick, Memphis, Tenn., Lemle & Kelleher, New Orleans, La., of counsel for Monsanto Chemical Co.
W. Emmett Marston, Memphis, Tenn., Martin, Tate & Morrow, Memphis, Tenn., of counsel for No. 3 Bull Towing Co., and others.
Before WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal in an admiralty case in which the Monsanto Chemical Company,1 hereinafter called plaintiff, sought damages from No. 3 Bull Towing Company, the Bull Durham, and Barge NBC 965, hereinafter called the defendants. The District Court found that the barge was unseaworthy because of a faulty valve, and that plaintiff's damages were directly and proximately caused by such unseaworthy condition...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.