The principal law question on these cross appeals is whether the Supreme Court committed reversible error in awarding exemplary damages as incidental to injunctive relief.
Plaintiff's complaint alleged a "plain and concise statement of the material facts" (Civ. Prac. Act, § 241) and "a demand of the judgment to which [it] supposed [itself] entitled" (Civ. Prac. Act, § 255). The facts...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.