MURRAY v. REIDY


21 Wis.2d 254 (1963)

MURRAY, Respondent, v. REIDY and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 29, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Stanley F. Schellinger, attorney, and James G. Doyle of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by J. Jerome Finn, attorney, and Roland J. Weber of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Finn.


WILKIE, J.

Appellants contend that the plaintiff was guilty of causal contributory negligence as a matter of law and ask for a new trial on the issues of negligence.

There are two issues raised on this appeal. They are:

1. Was the plaintiff contributorily negligent as a matter of law because she entered an automobile driven by a person who had consumed, during a period of approximately seven hours, approximately four mixed drinks, eight glasses of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases