BOYD v. STATE

6 Div. 40.

158 So.2d 115 (1963)

Earnest BOYD v. STATE of Alabama.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 21, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Corretti & Newsom, Birmingham, and Hawkins, Rhea & Wright, Gadsden, for petitioner.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Maurice F. Bishop, Birmingham, opposed.


GOODWYN, Justice.

Petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals.

We have no alternative but to strike the petition because it is not on transcript paper. Supreme Court Rule 32, Revised Rules of the Supreme Court, 261 Ala. XIX, XXXI, Code 1940, Tit. 7, 1955 Cumulative Pocket Part, p. 233, Recompiled Code 1958, Tit. 7, Appendix, p. 1172; Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 274 Ala. 613, 149 So.2d 923; Smith v. Smith, 273...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases