PINGEL v. THIELMAN


20 Wis.2d 246 (1963)

PINGEL, Appellant, v. THIELMAN and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 4, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Wayne W. Schlosser of Sheboygan.

For the respondents there was a brief and oral argument by Ben E. Salinsky of Sheboygan.


CURRIE, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial in the interest of justice under sec. 270.49, Stats. A trial court has the power to grant a new trial in the interest of justice because the verdict is against the great weight of the evidence. Bohlman v. Nelson (1958), 5 Wis.2d 77, 92 N.W.2d 345; Guptill v. Roemer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases