1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 327 F.2d
  5. 327 F.2d 888 (1963)
 

RETAIL CLERKS LOCAL UNION NO. 381 v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Nos. 17741, 17784, 17790.

327 F.2d 888 (1963)

RETAIL CLERKS LOCAL UNION NO. 381, affiliated with the Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. INDUSTRIAL CONFERENCE BOARD and Kitsap County Retail Druggists' Association, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL CONFERENCE BOARD and Kitsap County Retail Druggists' Association, et al., Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided December 19, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Tim L. Bornstein, Washington, D. C., for petitioner in No. 17741. Messrs. Sol Lippman, Washington, D. C., and Hugh Hafer, Seattle, Wash., were on the brief.

Mr. James V. Ramsdell, Tacoma, Wash., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Washington, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioners in No. 17784 and respondents in No. 17790. Mr. Homer S. Carpenter, Washington, D. C., was on the brief.

Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent in Nos. 17741 and 17784 and petitioner in No. 17790.

Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and FAHY and McGOWAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In No. 17741, Retail Clerks Local Union No. 381, et al. v. NLRB, the petition is denied.

In No. 17784, Industrial Conference Board and Kitsap County Retail Druggists' Association, et al., v. NLRB, and in No. 17790, NLRB v. Industrial Conference Board, et al., the Order of the Board, except as hereinafter provided, is enforced, accompanied with denial of the petition in No. 17784 and grant of the petition in No. 17790, provided, however, that insofar...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases