APPLICATION OF STEINBOCK

Patent Appeal No. 6907.

312 F.2d 828 (1963)

Application of Edmund A. STEINBOCK, Jr.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 13, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph A. Rave, Cincinnati, Ohio (Frank P. Cyr, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D. C. (George C. Roeming, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, SMITH and ALMOND, Judges.


SMITH, Judge.

Appellant has appealed from a decision of the Board of Appeals which affirmed the examiner's final rejection of claims 17 and 18 of appellant's application1 for patent for an "Investment Mixer" as obvious in view of the prior art. Six claims were allowed.

Appellant's application discloses an apparatus used in mixing and compacting an "investment." An "investment" is a cementitious mass that is formed of a powder,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases