Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice June 3, 1931, in the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department.
Six charges of professional misconduct were brought against respondent. These charges involved conversion, fraud, the wrongful obtaining of money from a client by misrepresentation, and the habitual issuance of bad checks. These checks were issued against various accounts and were returned because of insufficient funds...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.