The record reveals that Kavanau developed laboratory equipment which respondent undertook to manufacture and sell with Kavanau to receive 5% of the selling price of the equipment as a royalty. Kavanau became convinced that he was not being paid the royalties to which he was entitled under the agreement and threatened legal action. Instead of commencing an action, however, Kavanau assigned all his right, title and interest in the agreement to appellant who brought the instant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
