Appellant contends, first, that the sale of the premises in one parcel was contrary to the provisions of law and of the judgment. The judgment, upon a form supplied by a stationer, provided in the printed portion of the form that "the mortgaged premises * * * or such part thereof as is sufficient to discharge the mortgage debt, the expenses of the sale and the costs of the action, and which may be sold separately and without material injury to the parties interested" (cf...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
