Judgment affirmed.
In our opinion, the conviction is amply supported by the evidence. The witness who identified defendant as the driver of the stolen vehicle was positive in his identification; and any question as the credibility of such witness was for the jury to decide. Moreover, the direct evidence of defendant's possession of the stolen vehicle, and of his unexplained presence therein justified the inference that defendant either stole the vehicle or knew that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
