Judgment affirmed.
The denial of the motion for a new trial based on the posttrial recantation statement of the witness Atamanchuk, was proper; and it was also a proper exercise of discretion to deny such motion without a hearing. There is no question that the identification of the voice of defendant on the tapes was accurate. The identification was corroborated by other evidence. The trial court did not give credence to the posttrial statement. Hence, there was insufficient...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
