1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 204 F.Supp.
  5. 204 F.Supp. 580 (1962)
 

PAUL M. HARROD COMPANY v. A. B. DICK COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 36519.

204 F.Supp. 580 (1962)

The PAUL M. HARROD COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. A. B. DICK COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

May 9, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis B. Douglass, Cleveland, Ohio, Donald P. McHugh, Washington, D. C., of counsel, for plaintiff.

Arthur L. Dougan, Jones, Day, Cockley & Reavis, Cleveland, Ohio, Charles A. Horsky, Covington & Burling, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

KALBFLEISCH, District Judge.

Defendant has moved for summary judgment as to all claims in this treble damage action under the antitrust laws (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2, 14, 15 and 22) and, in the alternative, for dismissal of the complaint for failure to state claims upon which relief can be granted.

Previously, D.C., 194 F.Supp. 502, this Court sustained defendant's motions to dismiss that part of the complaint based...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases