1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 303 F.2d
  5. 303 F.2d 435 (1962)
 

N. L. R. B. v. TEXAS ALUMINUM COMPANY

No. 19067.

303 F.2d 435 (1962)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. TEXAS ALUMINUM COMPANY, Inc., Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 30, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Elliot Moore, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Carl B. Callaway, Joe P. Mathews, Dallas, Tex., for respondent.

Before HUTCHESON, CAMERON and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In deference to respondent's earnestness in attacking as erroneous the announced conclusion of our opinion:

"There is no evidence whatever that there was any more loafing or interfering with the working time of other employees than would have been the case if the company had not adopted the rule or had maintained a regular rest period. Indeed, there was no attempt to make such proof."

we have carefully reconsidered the conclusion in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases