Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered.
When faced by a contradiction between the testimony of the People's fingerprint experts and the testimony of the defendant's fingerprint expert, as to whether a "latent" fingerprint discovered in the allegedly burglarized premises was, in fact, an impression made by the third finger of defendant's right hand, the court obtained the consent of the parties, including that of the defendant himself,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
