SINCLAIR REFINING CO. v. ATKINSON

No. 434.

370 U.S. 195 (1962)

SINCLAIR REFINING CO. v. ATKINSON ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 18, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George B. Christensen argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Fred H. Daugherty and Richard W. Austin.

Gilbert A. Cornfield argued the cause for respondents. With him on the briefs were Gilbert Feldman and William E. Rentfro.


MR. JUSTICE BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question this case presents is whether § 301 of the Taft-Hartley Act, in giving federal courts jurisdiction of suits between employers and unions for breach of collective bargaining agreements,1 impliedly repealed § 4 of the pre-existing Norris-LaGuardia Act, which, with certain exceptions not here material, barred federal courts from issuing injunctions "in any case involving...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases