The basic question presented is whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable where the injured plaintiff claims to have sustained personal injury as the result of a permanent hair-wave treatment administered to her in defendant's beauty parlor by a machineless method known as the "cold wave" process. Involved in that question is the issue whether the lotion or lotions used in said process proximately caused the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
RAVO v. LIDO
17 A.D.2d 476 (1962)
Matilda Ravo et al., Respondents, v. Jay Lido, Doing Business as Jay's Cut & Swirl Studio, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 24, 1962.
December 24, 1962.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Jacobs & Rubin (
UGHETTA, Acting P. J., KLEINFELD, BRENNAN and HOPKINS, JJ., concur.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.